News Ticker

Romantic Trapezoid

Joy Donze lights up stale new comedy inspired by thirties movies and we want to see more of her.

Share your thoughts in the comment section below.

Elizabeth Inghram and Joy Donze in a scene from “Romantic Trapezoid” (Photo credit: Hunter Canning)

[avatar user=”Victor Gluck” size=”96″ align=”left” ] Victor Gluck, Editor-in-Chief[/avatar]It isn’t until 35 minutes into Victor L. Cahn’s new comedy, Romantic Trapezoid, that Joy Donze as Beth enters and lights up the stage. Until then two rather dull but successful people, Melissa, a rising journalist, and Dave, a film critic and professor, argue about their relationship in clichéd terms. Dave has been waiting three hours for Melissa to return home from an interview and is exasperated that this has happened many times before even though she has promised to not let it happen again. He is also annoyed that she maintains “friendships” with many of the men she interviews – though he suspects more is going on. However, as Melissa makes perfectly clear, although she loves Dave best she is not willing to settle down or make a permanent commitment. They bicker and trade insults but there is nothing new here, we’ve heard it all before.

And then in the second scene, Beth, Dave’s graduate assistant/secretary, arrives to pay Melissa a visit. Played by the sparking Donze, Beth is as beautiful as Melissa but younger, nubile, inquisitive, outspoken, direct – and outrageous. Apparently, having fallen in love with Dave’s course on “Films of the Thirties,” she has now fallen in love with him. Beth has decided she wants to marry Dave soon and sees Melissa as her competition. Barging into Melissa’s apartment, she tells her why she has come, describes her life with Dave in New Jersey, asks for a drink, requests permission to try on Melissa’s dresses and generally behaves like a pushy millennial. Ultimately, she asks Melissa to make up her mind if she is serious about Dave or not. But does Dave know she has made this visit? While Donze is on stage the play seems bubbly, clever and fresh. We keep waiting for her second appearance, but, alas, the playwright has not given her one. And then we go back to dull and boring Melissa and Dave.

The final scene has a clever notion: Melissa claims to be writing a screenplay and wants Dave’s advice and he is intrigued as it sounds more and more like the films he teaches. The lights become film noirish, and she and he take on the roles of thirties and forties Hollywood stars, Rosalind Russell, Myrna Loy, Claudette Colbert, Cary Grant, Henry Fonda, Fred MacMurray. In other hands, this scene might have been quite witty; however, as it is all so literal to what we already know, it falls rather flat.

Elizabeth Inghram and Zack Calhoon in a scene from “Romantic Trapezoid” (Photo credit: Hunter Canning)

The problem is that under Albert Bonilla’s stolid and matter-of-fact direction, Elizabeth Ingham and Zack Calhoon’s characters never come alive. Just trading quips is not a sophisticated style and as all of their lines are said the same way without variety, it becomes tiresome quite soon. While Donze continually surprises us as Beth, Melissa and Dave remain the same throughout. And the production design doesn’t help much. While the couple discusses what good taste Melissa has in buying Dave’s shirts, Viviane Galloway’s costumes are extremely conservative and colorless, no proof of any special taste whatever.

The same could be said of the living room of Melissa’s apartment where the entire play takes place. Sheryl Liu has color coordinated everything in beige, brown and white, but there are no pictures on the walls or art work of any kind. Someone as upscale as Melissa would have acquired some decorations by now. Except for the attempt at film noir lighting which doesn’t really go with the romantic comedy scene played by Melissa and Dave at the end, Pamela Kupper’s lighting offers nothing in the way of mood. While sound designer Nick Simone includes appropriate cocktail music before each scene, the songs are more romantic and atmospheric than anything that happens in the dialogue.

The biggest mistake is the title which is entirely a misnomer. With two women in love with one man what we have here is a triangle. If there is a special meaning to “trapezoid” which fits this play, it is never explained, never referred to. One gets the feeling that the author fancies himself a scholar of Hollywood romantic comedies of the thirties, the sort of movie that would have teamed William Powell and Myrna Loy or Katherine Hepburn and Cary Grant. Unfortunately, Romantic Trapezoid which starts with an interesting premise does not live up to its antecedents or possibilities. The special quality that those movies had going for them were bigger than life and charming personalities played by glamorous stars and witty one-liners which you wish you had said, neither of which this play has to offer.

Romantic Trapezoid (through November 25, 2017)

Rachel Reiner Productions LLC

Lion Theatre, 410 W. 42nd Street, in Manhattan

For tickets, call 212-239-6200 or visit

Running time: 90 minutes without an intermission

Share your thoughts in the comment section below.

About Victor Gluck, Editor-in-Chief (991 Articles)
Victor Gluck was a drama critic and arts journalist with Back Stage from 1980 – 2006. He started reviewing for in 2006, where he was also Associate Editor from 2011-2013, and has been Editor-in-Chief since 2014. He is a voting member of The Drama Desk, the Outer Critics Circle, the American Theatre Critics Association, and the Dramatists Guild of America. His plays have been performed at the Quaigh Theatre, Ryan Repertory Company, St. Clements Church, Nuyorican Poets Café and The Gene Frankel Playwrights/Directors Lab.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.